Is nuclear power regaining energy?

Is nuclear power regaining energy?

Getty Images A workman at Hinkley Point C nuclear power station, which is being constructed in the southwest of EnglandGetty Images

A number of countries including the UK are building new nuclear power stations

A decade ago, it seemed as though the global nuclear industry was in an irreversible decline.

Concerns over safety, cost, and what to do with radioactive waste had sapped enthusiasm for a technology once seen as a revolutionary source of abundant cheap energy.

Yet now there is widespread talk of a revival, fuelled by tech giants Microsoft, Google and Amazon all announcing investments in the sector, as well as the growing pressures on wealthy nations to curb their carbon emissions.

But how real is the comeback?

When commercial nuclear power was first developed in the 1950s and 1960s, governments were seduced by its seemingly unlimited potential.

Nuclear reactors could harness and control the same awesome forces released by atomic bombs – to provide electricity for millions of homes. With a single kilogram of uranium yielding some 20,000 times as much energy as a kilogram of coal, it seemed like the future.

But the technology also inspired public fear. And that fear seemed to be justified by the Chernobyl disaster, which spread radioactive contamination across Europe in early 1986.

It fuelled widespread public and political opposition – and slowed the growth of the industry.

Another accident, at the Fukushima Daichi plant in Japan in 2011, re-energised concerns about nuclear safety. Japan itself shut down all of its reactors in the immediate aftermath, and only 12 have since restarted.

Germany decided to phase out nuclear power altogether. Other countries scaled back plans to invest in new power plants, or extend the lives of ageing facilities.

According to the International Atomic Energy Agency, this led to the loss of 48GW of electric power generation globally between 2011 and 2020.

Getty Images A worker measuring radiation levels at the Fukushima Daichi nuclear power station in 2014Getty Images

The Fukushima nuclear accident in 2011 raised new fears about the safety of the global industry

But nuclear development did not stop. In China, for example, there were 13 nuclear reactors in 2011. There are now 55, with another 23 under construction.

For Beijing, scrambling to meet rapidly growing electricity demand, nuclear had, and still has, a vital role to play.

Now interest in the sector seems to be growing elsewhere once again. This is partly because developed countries are hunting for ways to meet energy demand, while striving to meet emissions reduction targets under the Paris Agreement.

With 2024 projected to be the warmest year on record, the pressure to cut carbon emissions is mounting. A renewed focus on energy security, in the wake of Russia’s invasion of Ukraine, has also been a factor.

South Korea, for example, recently scrapped plans to phase out its large fleet of nuclear power stations over the next four decades – and will build more instead.

And France has reversed plans to reduce its own reliance on nuclear energy, which provides 70% of its electricity. Instead, it wants to build up to eight new reactors.

In addition, last week the US government reaffirmed at the United Nations Climate Change Conference, or Cop29, held in Azerbaijan, that it intends to triple nuclear power generation by 2050.

The White House had originally pledged to do this on the side lines of last year’s conference, Cop28. A total of 31 countries have now agreed to try to triple their use of nuclear power by 2050, including the UK, France and Japan.

Also at Cop29, which ends on Friday, 22 November, the US and UK announced that they would collaborate to speed up the development of new nuclear power technology.

This follows after it was agreed in the final statement or “stocktake” of last year’s Cop28 that nuclear should be one of the zero or low emission technologies to be “accelerated” to help combat climate change.

But hunger for clean power is not just coming from governments. Technology giants are striving to develop more and more applications that use artificial intelligence.

Yet AI relies on data – and data centres need constant, reliable electricity. According to Barclays Research, data centres account for 3.5% of electricity consumption in the US today, but that figure could rise to more than 9% by the end of the decade.

In September, Microsoft signed a 20-year deal to buy power from Constellation Energy, which will lead to the reopening of the infamous Three Mile Island power station in Pennsylvania – the site of the worst nuclear accident in US history, where a reactor suffered a partial meltdown in 1979.

Despite its tainted public image, another reactor at the plant continued to generate electricity until 2019. Constellation’s chief executive Joe Dominguez described the deal to reopen it as a “powerful symbol of the rebirth of nuclear power as a clean and reliable energy resource”.

Other tech giants have taken a different approach. Google plans to buy energy produced from a handful of so-called Small Modular Reactors or SMRs – a nascent technology intended to make nuclear energy easier and cheaper to deploy. Amazon is also supporting SMR development and construction.

SMRs themselves are being promoted, in part, as a solution to one of the biggest drawbacks facing nuclear power today. In western nations, new power stations have to be built to exacting modern safety standards. This makes them prohibitively expensive and complicated to build.

Hinkley Point C is a good example. Britain’s first new nuclear power station since the mid-1990s is being built on a stretch of remote coastline in southwest England.

It is meant to be the first of a batch of new plants to replace the country’s ageing reactor fleet. But the project is running some five years behind schedule and will cost up to £9bn ($11.5bn) more than planned.

It is not an isolated case. The US’s newest reactors at Plant Vogtle in Georgia opened seven years late, and cost more than $35bn – well over double their original budget.

SMRs are designed to solve this problem. They will be smaller than traditional reactors, using standardised parts that can be assembled quickly, at sites close to where the power is needed.

But while there are some 80 different designs under development globally, according to the International Atomic Energy Agency, the concept has yet to be proven commercially.

Getty Images The Three Mile Island nuclear power stationGetty Images

Microsoft’s need for electricity will see the Three Mile Island nuclear power station, pictured, restart

Opinions about nuclear power remain highly polarised. Supporters claim the technology is indispensable if climate targets are to be reached. Among them is Rod Adams, whose Nucleation Capital fund promotes investment in nuclear technology.

“Nuclear fission has a seven-decade history showing it is one of the safest power sources available,” he explains.

“It is a durable, reliable source of power with low ongoing costs already, but capital costs have been too high in Western countries.”

Opponents though, insist nuclear power is not the answer.

According to Professor M.V. Ramana of the University of British Columbia, it is “a folly to consider nuclear energy as clean”. It is, he says, “one of the most expensive ways to generate electricity. Investing in cheaper low-carbon sources of energy will provide more emissions reductions per dollar.”

If current trends do herald a new nuclear age, one old problem remains. After 70 years of atomic power, there is still disagreement over what to do with the accumulated radioactive waste – some of which will remain hazardous for hundreds of thousands of years.

The answer being pursued by many governments is geological disposal – burying the waste in sealed tunnels deep underground. But only one country, Finland, has actually built such a facility, while environmentalists and anti-nuclear campaigners argue that dumping waste out of sight and out of mind is simply too risky.

Solving that conundrum may be a key factor in dictating whether there really will be a new age of nuclear power.


Source link

75,000-Year-Old Fire Pit Shows Neanderthal Innovation With Tar

75,000-Year-Old Fire Pit Shows Neanderthal Innovation With Tar


75,000-Year-Old Fire Pit Shows Neanderthal Innovation With Tar

We often associate the word “caveman” with crude simplicity. But based on a new finding, maybe we should, instead, use it as a stand-in for technological innovation.

Researchers discovered a new kind of fire pit dating back about 75,000 years. After analyzing its novel design — a ringed trench rather than a simple pit — and the traces of chemical components left behind by burning, they determined that Neanderthals used it to produce tar from rockrose (Cistus ladanifer). They then employed that tar to attach stone to wood for making both tools and weapons.

The scientists reverse-engineered the methods the Neanderthals likely used in this process and demonstrated that they did indeed produce tar. They reported their results in Quaternary Scientific Reviews.

Harnessing Fire

It’s essentially a given that, once early man discovered how to make, control, and even transfer fire, they tapped into it as a source for light, heat, and cooking. More recently, archeologists have also found evidence that Neanderthals also harnessed fire to smoke food, harden wood, and create resins needed to make tools.

“Our results advance our understanding of Neanderthal behaviour, as the ability to organize activities related with the use of fire,” said the authors in the paper.

The scientists used many chemical and geological analytical methods to determine how the pit was built and used. They detected minerals, pollen, and guano from the period.

Reverse Engineering Neanderthal Process

Here’s how they think the Neanderthals made tar. First, they lined the bottom of the trough with dried rockrose leaves. Next, they covered the leaves with a soil and sand mixture. Then they added a layer of guano on top, and lit dry grasses to start and maintain a fire. After the guano layer formed a crust and cooled off, they broke through it to harvest the pitch.

The researchers dug a pit similar to the one they found in the cave. Then they followed the step-by-step process they intuited via their analytical methods. Finally, they harvested the pitch and used it to haft a stone spear tip to a wooden shaft.

Producing Tar with Available Resources

“We managed to produce a significant amount of tar in a relevant period of time of not more than 4 hours, counting from collecting wood to hafting,” the authors said in the paper.

They noted that similar methods — but with different hearth or fire pit designs — have been used to create pitch from birch. But this design shows how early man could adapt to his surroundings and use specialized techniques to take advantage of available resources. For instance, there likely was plenty of rockrose in that area 75,000 years ago, but little or no birch.

This level of specialization shows that early man could be quite sophisticated in creating materials for tools.

“Neanderthals were able to construct layered and complex hearths with specific technological objectives that could have included tool, medicine and/or weapon elaboration,” the paper concludes.


Article Sources

Our writers at Discovermagazine.com use peer-reviewed studies and high-quality sources for our articles, and our editors review for scientific accuracy and editorial standards. Review the sources used below for this article:


Before joining Discover Magazine, Paul Smaglik spent over 20 years as a science journalist, specializing in U.S. life science policy and global scientific career issues. He began his career in newspapers, but switched to scientific magazines. His work has appeared in publications including Science News, Science, Nature, and Scientific American.


Source link

The dark energy pushing our universe apart may not be what it seems, scientists say


Distant, ancient galaxies are giving scientists more hints that a mysterious force called dark energy may not be what they thought. Astronomers know the universe is expanding at an accelerating rate and they have long thought that a constant force called dark energy is what is pushing it apart. But findings published Tuesday by an international research collaboration are bolstering the suggestion first made earlier this year by the same group that there may be something else going on. By looking at the movement of galaxies over billions of years it appears as though the energy appears is changing or weakening over time.


Source link

Why Is There So Much Off-Brand Oral Ozempic for Sale Online?

Why Is There So Much Off-Brand Oral Ozempic for Sale Online?

Since they debuted, injectable GLP-1 drugs like Ozempic have been in high demand. In addition to treating diabetes and obesity, these medications have cardiovascular benefits, and there’s evidence they may curb addiction and possibly even protect against some types of cancer, which has only further broadened their appeal. But for people who hate needles, these medications hold a glaring, obvious drawback: They require taking a weekly shot.

Now, though, on platforms like Instagram and Facebook, ads for oral knock-off versions of GLP-1 drugs are proliferating. After the brand-name GLP-1 drugs went into shortage in 2022, a booming industry of “compounding” pharmacies and telehealth clinics arose to offer copies of the medications, as they are legally permitted to do when shortages exist. But unlike the pharma giants that produce the originals, these virtual clinics and specialty pharmacies are offering versions of semaglutide and tirzepatide for weight loss that are taken by mouth. They offer lozenges, tablets, pills, cheek gels, drops, and dissolving strips, promising to deliver the same active ingredients as the trademark medications without the injections.

It’s an appealing prospect—especially since these drugs are offered at a fraction of the price of their name-brand counterparts and are often shipped overnight after a prospective patient fills out a quick online questionnaire. A month’s supply of semaglutide lozenges with vitamin B6 added from the telehealth startup Strut, for example, costs $149 without insurance, versus Wegovy’s $1,000-plus price tag.

“As a pharmacist, I can appreciate the excitement in the rise in oral semaglutide, since it is an easier route than injectables,” says Melinda Lee, a pharmacist who runs the pharmaceutical packaging company Parcel Health as well as a GLP-1 drug availability database. Oral versions also don’t need to be refrigerated like injectables, which makes them easier to ship and store. But although she understands the enthusiasm, Lee remains skeptical. While taking a drug by mouth might be more appealing than a needle, when it comes to GLP-1s, the evidence that they’re as effective just isn’t there yet, she says.

Unlike the brand-name drugs Ozempic, Wegovy, Mounjaro, and Zepbound, compounded versions haven’t been rigorously tested in clinical trials, and they’re not approved by the Food and Drug Administration. And although by law they must contain the same active ingredient as the drug they mimic, these orally formulated medications may not work nearly as well as the injectable drugs.

Maria Daniela Hurtado Andrade, an obesity specialist at the Mayo Clinic in Jacksonville, Florida, says she doesn’t recommend oral compounded GLP-1 medications to her patients. “I do not consider them, I do not prescribe them, and I do not endorse them,” she says.


Source link

36,000-Year-Old Scimitar-Toothed Cat Cub Found in Yakutian Permafrost

36,000-Year-Old Scimitar-Toothed Cat Cub Found in Yakutian Permafrost

The 36,000-year-old frozen specimen from Yakutia belongs to Homotherium latidens, a species of scimitar-toothed cat that inhabited Eurasia during the Pliocene and Pleistocene epochs, and significantly differs from a modern lion cub in the elongated front legs, the unusual shape of the muzzle with a large mouth opening and small ears, the very massive neck region, and the dark coat color.

Homotherium serum. Image credit: Sergiodlarosa / CC BY-SA 3.0.

Homotherium serum. Image credit: Sergiodlarosa / CC BY-SA 3.0.

Homotherium latidens was between 1.5 and 2 m in length, up to 1.1 m in height, and weighed up to 200 kg — about the average size of a modern lion or tiger.

However, its physical appearance differed from other big cats: the extinct species had long saber-like canines, a sloping back, and a short tail.

Homotherium was widespread in the Plio-Pleistocene of Eurasia, Africa, and Americas,” said lead author Dr. Alexey Lopatin and his colleagues.

“For a long time, the latest presence of Homotherium in Eurasia was recorded in the Middle Pleistocene.”

“A significant event was the discovery of the mandible of the Late Pleistocene Homotherium latidens from the North Sea, which is dated to 28,000 years ago.”

“The largest number of Late Pleistocene finds of Homotherium is concentrated in North America (more than 30 localities), where they traditionally classified in the species Homotherium serum.”

In their new study, the authors examined the frozen mummified carcass of a Homotherium latidens cub found in the Pleistocene permafrost at the locality of Badyarikhskoe on the Badyarikha River in the northeast of Yakutia, Siberia.

“The numerous bones of mammoth fauna representatives are collected from the loess-like loams of the Yedoma horizon in this locality,” they said.

According to the researchers, the Badyarikha specimen is approximately 36,000 years old.

“The specimen includes the head and the anterior part of the body preserved approximately to the caudal edge of the chest,” they said.

“There are also incomplete pelvic bones articulated with the femur and shin bones.”

“They were found encased in a piece of ice along with the front part of the cub.”

The team’s analysis shows that most of the postcranial features of Homotherium latidens can be traced already at the age of three weeks.

“The length of the preserved part of the Homotherium cub body from the nose tip to the gap in the chest region (at the level of the 12th vertebra) is 248 mm,” the scientists said.

“The body is covered with short, thick, soft, dark brown fur with hair about 20-30 mm long. The fur on the back and neck is longer than on the legs.”

“On the upper lip two rows of vibrissae are clearly visible, mostly broken off at a height of 3-5 mm from the roots.”

“In the region of the mouth corner, the hair is significantly elongated.”

“The general morphology of the skull is typical of a juvenile felid,” they added.

“The skull is also distinguished by a relatively longer facial region, a rounded braincase, expanded zygomatic arches, a wide area of premaxillaries, and large upper deciduous incisors.”

“The nasal bones of the Homotherium cub compared to a lion cub are greatly shortened and widened.”

“The neck is longer and more than twice as thick as that of a lion,” they said.

“The difference in thickness is explained by the large volume of muscles, which is visually observed at the site of separation of the skin from the mummified flesh.”

“The length of the forelimbs in the Homotherium cub is 18-23% greater than that in the lion cub.”

“At the same time, the body length of the latter is equal to the dimension of Homotherium or exceeds it by approximately 10%.”

“The increased size of the oral fissure indicates for wide mouth gape adaptation.”

“The front paw of the Homotherium cub has a rounded shape. Its width is almost equal to its length, in contrast to lion cubs with their elongated and relatively narrow front paw.”

“All claws are sharp and strongly curved. In cross section, the claws are laterally compressed and have the same shape as in the lion cub.”

“The wide paw, the subsquare shape of its pads, and the absence of a carpal pad are adaptations to walking in snow and low temperatures.”

“The small, low auricles and absence of the carpal pad in the Badyarikha Homotherium contrast with the taller auricles and normally developed pads in the lion cub. All these features can be interpreted as adaptations to living in cold climate.”

The discovery of a Homotherium latidens cub radically expands the understanding of distribution of the genus and confirms its presence in the Late Pleistocene of Asia.

“For the first time in the history of paleontological research, the external appearance of an extinct mammal that has no analogues in the modern fauna has been studied directly,” the authors concluded.

Their paper was published this week in the journal Scientific Reports.

_____

A.V. Lopatin et al. 2024. Mummy of a juvenile sabre-toothed cat Homotherium latidens from the Upper Pleistocene of Siberia. Sci Rep 14, 28016; doi: 10.1038/s41598-024-79546-1


Source link

‘Bomb Cyclone’ and Atmospheric River Will Bring Extreme Weather to U.S. West Coast

‘Bomb Cyclone’ and Atmospheric River Will Bring Extreme Weather to U.S. West Coast

Bomb Cyclone’ and Atmospheric River Will Pummel U.S. West Coast

A major windstorm and an atmospheric river are set to unleash a “firehose” of precipitation from California to British Columbia

GeoColor daytime image of the United States Pacific coast showing a storm system approaching from the west on November 19, 2024

A “bomb cyclone” and atmospheric river are set to bring damaging winds, heavy snow and torrential rain to the West Coast.

NOAA/NESDIS/STAR GOES-West

A “bomb cyclone” is bringing damaging winds to parts of the U.S. Northwest and northern California today, and the storm is helping to set up powerful atmospheric river that one weather experts says will open a “firehose” of rain and snow onto parts of the West Coast. Northern California will be particularly hard-hit by extreme rainfall rates.

The term bomb cyclone refers to an area of low atmospheric pressure that suddenly “deepens,” or drops even further in pressure. This process, called bombogenesis, happens when a storm system’s pressure falls by a certain amount within 24 hours, based on the system’s current latitude. At a latitude of around 45 degrees North, bombogenesis occurs when pressure drops by at least 18 to 20 millibars. This storm will easily clear that hurdle, dropping between 60 and 70 millibars in 24 to 36 hours, wrote climate scientist Daniel Swain in a recent post on his blog. “This will likely be among the fastest if not the singularly fastest-deepening low pressure system on record in this region,” he added.

The storm will bring winds up to 70 miles per hours to parts of Washington State, Oregon and California, where it could knock out electricity and damage trees, according to the National Weather Service. Blizzard conditions are forecast for Washington’s portion of the Cascade Range.


On supporting science journalism

If you’re enjoying this article, consider supporting our award-winning journalism by subscribing. By purchasing a subscription you are helping to ensure the future of impactful stories about the discoveries and ideas shaping our world today.


A front (essentially the boundary between two air masses with different temperatures and humidities) associated with the bomb cyclone is expected to stall near northern California on Wednesday, and that will set up a stream of water vapor called an atmospheric river. Such streams can be up to 2,000 miles long, 500 miles wide and two miles high, with a flow of moisture 25 times that of the Mississippi River. This atmospheric river will be pulling tropical moisture from around Hawaii and sending it over to the West Coast in in several waves of heavy to extreme precipitation, particularly in mountainous areas. It is a bit uncertain which areas will get the biggest impacts because the river can “wiggle” up and down along the coast, as Swain put it on his blog.

He also noted that this atmospheric river will likely pull in even more water vapor because of unusually high ocean temperatures along its path.

Though atmospheric rivers are crucial to supplying the winter precipitation that later provides water to the largely arid West during the dry season, the torrential nature of such rains can also be dangerous. They can cause mudslides and flash flooding—hazards that are particularly of concern near the burn scars of wildfires because the scorched soil cannot soak up the onslaught of water, raising the risk of landslides.


Source link

SpaceX completes sixth Starship flight, with both booster and spacecraft splashing down

SpaceX completes sixth Starship flight, with both booster and spacecraft splashing down


SpaceX launched the sixth test flight of its Starship rocket on Tuesday, as the company looks to keep up momentum of the mammoth vehicle’s development.

The rocket took off from SpaceX’s private “Starbase” facility near Brownsville, Texas. There were not any people onboard the Starship flight.

Starship reached space and traveled halfway around the Earth before reentering the atmosphere and splashing down in the Indian Ocean.

SpaceX had aimed to return the rocket’s “Super Heavy” booster after it separated from Starship and land it on the arms of the company’s launch tower. But SpaceX said during its webcast that the booster did not clear its “commit criteria” needed for the catch attempt, so the booster splashed down in the Gulf of Mexico instead.

As with each previous test flight, SpaceX is pushing development further by testing additional Starship capabilities, including this time reigniting an engine while in space and testing new elements of its heatshield.

Additionally, the evening launch time meant that this was the first time Starship made a daylight splashdown in the Indian Ocean.

SpaceX typically has a cadre of VIPs to view Starship launches and, with CEO Elon Musk’s close relationship with President-elect Donald Trump, the sixth flight was no different. Trump attended the launch on Tuesday, similar to when he came to watch SpaceX’s first astronaut launch in Florida in 2020 during his first administration.

Pushing the envelope

SpaceX has flown the full Starship rocket system on six spaceflight tests so far since April 2023, at a steadily increasing cadence. Its previous launch last month featured the dramatic first catch of the rocket’s more than 20-story tall booster.

After the successful fifth flight, the Federal Aviation Administration confirmed that SpaceX was authorized to move forward with the sixth flight.

But, as with its previous test flights, the fifth launch was not without incidents. SpaceX management, in audio posted after the launch on social media by Musk, revealed that Starship’s booster nearly missed the catch due to a timing issue with one of the rocket’s subsystems.

“We were one second away from that tripping and telling the rocket to abort and try to crash into the ground next to the tower instead of [landing at] the tower — like, erroneously tell a healthy rocket to not try that catch,” an unidentified person told Musk in the audio.

SpaceX did not catch the booster again. The company said on its website that it made hardware upgrades to the rocket’s booster for improved redundancy and improved structural strength.

The Starship system is designed to be fully reusable and aims to become a new method of flying cargo and people beyond Earth. The rocket is also critical to NASA’s plan to return astronauts to the moon. SpaceX won a multibillion-dollar contract from the agency to use Starship as a crewed lunar lander as part of NASA’s Artemis moon program.

Starship is both the tallest and most powerful rocket ever launched. Fully stacked on the Super Heavy booster, Starship stands 397 feet tall and is about 30 feet in diameter.

The Super Heavy booster, which stands 232 feet tall, is what begins the rocket’s journey to space. At its base are 33 Raptor engines, which together produce 16.7 million pounds of thrust — about double the 8.8 million pounds of thrust of NASA’s Space Launch System rocket, which launched for the first time in 2022.

Starship itself, at 165 feet tall, has six Raptor engines — three for use while in the Earth’s atmosphere and three for operating in the vacuum of space.

The rocket is powered by liquid oxygen and liquid methane. The full system requires more than 10 million pounds of propellant for launch.


Source link

From Bench to Podcast: Ali Shaib

From Bench to Podcast: Ali Shaib

In this episode, Associate Editor Cláudia Vilhena sits down with Ali Shaib, the lead author of an exciting new study showcasing expansion microscopy and the visualization of individual protein shapes using standard laboratory microscopes.

Tune in as Ali and Cláudia explore the “accidental” origins of the study, the importance of mentorship and collaboration, and the democratization of super-resolution methods.


Source link